Board Thread:DMC5 Spoilers/@comment-26429365-20190310115930/@comment-3087260-20190315031046

LegionZero wrote: Camilopezo wrote: Correction: 20 years younger.

In the anime, it is shown that Dante was a kid, 20 years ago. True, but my poimt still stands.

Gamma Venom 567 wrote:

Nah just have Mundus return in six and have get stronger than before I dont think recycling another villain so soon would be a good idea.

Gamma Venom 567 wrote:

the new demons won't be special anyway with Dante and Vergil in the underworld they weren't as powerful as previous villains. No one was supposed to be special/as powerful as Mundus or Argosax, yet we got Arkham, Sanctus, and Urizen.

Gamma Venom 567 wrote:

what demons go extinct? Why would they go extinct?

Gamma Venom 567 wrote:

Lame it's the same and the demons in those games won't be comparable. Yes the can be comparable. Its not hard to come up with another almighty villain. The villain doesnt even need to be almighty, Arkham and Sanctus werent and Nero isnt god-tier, so they can scale back the villain and still have a compelling story. Well look at Albert wesker and m. Bison they were main villain in more than one games and they were still popular even after death so why not dmc do the same? Pyron was the main villain of the first two games from the darkstalkers series and asatroth was the main villain of ghost and goblins. Mega man had dr willy as the main villain of most games so why can dmc use a previous villain once and give him an update for a future game?