User blog comment:Dante-Must-Die-Mode/What The Heaven And Hell?: Nero/@comment-967403-20150331035349

I also forgot commenting on this other portion:

A Maiden is a virgin. And Pure might implies that the person is good. We might not know exactly what is the criteria for a Pure Maiden but we definately know  Arkham is not. Arkhham is not a virgin and he definately ain't pure. XD He used Lady and she's a pure maiden.

Concerning the artbook: The user provided the page in which says that in japanese. If the person can read japanese or got the information, that person is valid unless someone and counters it. If you literally cannot prove, the person is by all means valid. Sure, the artbook has dropped concepts but that doesn't mean that particular claim is a dropped concept. That's a fallacy. She has already shown her proof. In the same logic, I could say "Oh well, Capcom for all I know can't produce DMC. How do we know DMC2 is actually canon?"  While Capcom has shown questionable ability that even I can say, that doens't mean they don't know If DMC2 is canon. Cause they do. If you're going to disapprove a claim, you gotta show evidence. Otherwise, it shows you're willing to dismiss a claim without showing actual evidence that the particular claim is false. A possibility is not fact. It's a possibility. You have to prove it to make it fact.

If you provided someone with a translation, they can skeptical all they want. If you've shown skill to translate japanese just fine and do so, you're not invalid because they don't beleive you. That's a personal problem on their end.

With the Trish thing: Legion is right. There's literally no context. We need more context around it before we can say for certain. And yes, If someone provides a link to a Lady spinoff and people deny it, they're stupid. Funny enough, what I say above applies too. If people give you concerete proof and provide for you and you deny it anyway, they're valid anyway unless you ACTUALLY prove them wrong.