User blog comment:Rapper256/Baal and Modeus/@comment-967403-20140814081435/@comment-24343525-20140818230407

@Jay Aserow Why I take note that being a Vandalizer would means you repeatedly vandalize? And vandalizer wouln't means me repeatedly vandalize. What do you mean "the act of vandalizing itself isn't bad."? Jim never found me a vandalizer, I never it be. Jim just think I wasa vandalizer because I did vandalizing. He needed to into blog the page because when Jim do it, I can't change the written and I can't do write comment. I don't understand nothing with your sentences "Why I told you this was because I wanted to make sure If you thought it was a honest mistake, you make note of that. Being a bureacurat of a wikia myself, I know that people may not unserstand what certain actions are. Vandalizing is one of them. It simply means replacing correct info with incorrect info. That itself isn't bad. It can happen on mistake. Being LABELED a Vandalizer is bad, as that implies you repeated vandalize & most likely do it out of spite. Keep that in mind.  Just next time, be sure to discuss changes like name changes before doing it to avoid an issue like this.

Whatever @LegionZero said is what I'm saying too. I  read your long paragraph & was going to retort with an equally long one but he summarizes my points fairly well. And with that, I have nothing more to say. I can't keep that in my mind, because I don't know what I keep in my mnd. Becayse I don't understand your says and you keep replying to me. I think you are a bureaucrat Dude, I agree I was vandalizing but I'm not vandalizing. I disagree tht.

I read your long paragraph too.