User blog comment:Anobi/Community Discussion - DmC page names/@comment-976055-20130418063028/@comment-976055-20130419033123

Yes, but only audibly. The point is the article names are all text-based, and are really only ever read. Any verbil discussion I've ever had has come down to using "classic" to differentiate subjects, and referring to games is DMC1/2/3/4 or DmC. Having (DmC) on the end of subjects that also have a classic variation has worked pretty well so far, I don't quite understand the need to change them.

It's not really all that different than disambiguation used on other wikis for things like Subject (film), Subject (book), and the like.

As Kryten said, too, it could cause confusion to use a different disambiguation if there's another DmC, and especially if Capcom decides to alternate development between both the classic DMC and the occidental-centric DmC, because then a DMC5 could come out in, say, 2014, then a DmC2 in 2015 etc etc. They had mused the idea, so it's a possible worry :s

"DmC" to me seems to be the best disambiguation since it's literally used by Capcom and NT do differentiate it from the classic DMC, and it's been in use on the wiki without any trouble.

Unless we wanna start something like (1st Gen) and (2nd Gen) or something...