Thread:JayAaerow/@comment-6769189-20150919155441/@comment-967403-20150921062828

Hey Legion,

For starters, A confirmation is a confirmation. It doesn't matter If something released after makes it vague or not. It could be for a number of reasons. Mistakes could happen. Or perhaps Capcom wanted to leave it vague there for people to invest their time into it or pique. Who knows? But withholding information because of it being confirmed in one case and left vague for UNKNOWN reasons from something that came later?

Part of the reason I've advocated Nero/Vergil relation in the past is: Verification is verification. The DMC Novels points (with the afterword explaining it's scenes intended to be in the game but was cut because production reasons. A confirmed context explaination over "Bingo left Capcom" in which has no sources and doesn't make sense since it still has Capcom's seal and writers move around company to company all the time.), Capcom employees point to it (Explaining it was originally meant to be in the game like the DMC Novels says it but the reveal WITHIN the story would be saved for a later installment. Meaning the audience is aware of this fact but as of now, Nero doesn't know and the background behind it can be explored later), the artbook does (Just clearly says it). You shouldn't need to ask me how to add something If it's been verified multiple times.

What kind of problems is the Rebellion page going through. Seems someone ended up deleting pictures that were a part of the page for some reason. I'll look into it soon and try to see how to incorporate it nice and neatly into the infobox. And sure, you can have a section dedicated to the different users or have it tabbed. That's completely okay and able to be done.